npm n8n-nodes-aopx@beta · MCP fr.aopx/aopx · API api.aopx.fr faq · provider routing · evidence
AOPX Evidence over claims FAQ
frequently asked questions / technical answers

Direct answers about AOPX.

Provider selection, Brave vs Tavily, fallback, MCP, reported production outcomes, benchmarks, Vendor Memory, privacy and the current public pilot.

What AOPX is and where it sits.

What is AOPX?

AOPX is an evidence-based provider-selection layer for software agents. It recommends a primary provider and fallback path, while keeping benchmark evidence separate from reported production outcomes.

Is AOPX a search engine?

No. In the current consultation model, AOPX does not execute the search. It recommends the provider path and the calling agent executes the provider externally.

Which providers does AOPX support today?

The current production SEARCH category supports Brave Search and Tavily Search. Serper is under evaluation and is not presented as a production provider until it is actually enabled.

How is AOPX different from Brave Search or Tavily?

Brave Search and Tavily are providers. AOPX is the decision layer above them. It helps an agent choose a provider path, use fallback when needed, and return the real outcome to build production evidence.

Why not just hard-code one search provider?

You can. AOPX becomes useful when an agent should avoid depending on one fixed provider, needs an explicit fallback path, or wants provider decisions to accumulate measurable production evidence over time.

Does AOPX choose the best provider?

AOPX does not claim that one provider is universally best. It returns a recommendation according to the current policy and available evidence.

Modes, fallback and provider decisions.

What does CRITICAL mode do?

CRITICAL returns a primary provider and a second-provider fallback path. Current evidence supports the value of fallback more strongly than a claim that contextual routing alone caused the measured reliability gain.

What does ECONOMY mode do?

ECONOMY is currently a fixed-provider reference path in SEARCH. AOPX does not claim a routing advantage for ECONOMY.

What happened to BALANCED mode?

BALANCED is disabled in the current v0 production policy because the earlier signal did not confirm on holdout.

What is a fallback?

Fallback means calling the second provider after the primary attempt fails according to the recommended path.

Does AOPX execute fallback automatically?

Not in the current consultation-only model. AOPX returns the primary and fallback path. The calling agent performs the provider calls externally and follows that path.

What is a reported production outcome?

It is the real result sent back to AOPX after execution of a production recommendation. It is reported by the caller and is not described as independently verified.

Production outcomes, benchmarks and memory.

How do I report an outcome?

Use the production outcome endpoint or the report_outcome MCP tool with the recommendation_id returned by AOPX and the actual provider attempt data.

Why does the recommendation_id matter?

AOPX only accepts an outcome for a known production recommendation. The recommendation_id ties the reported result to the provider path that AOPX actually returned.

Can the same recommendation receive multiple outcomes?

No. The production log enforces one outcome per recommendation.

Does AOPX validate the reported provider path?

Yes. Reported attempts are checked against the recommended provider path. For example, a successful primary attempt should not be followed by an unnecessary fallback attempt.

What enters Vendor Memory?

Production-only recommendation and outcome evidence can contribute to the private production record. LAB, benchmark, shadow and replay data are kept separate from production memory.

Is Vendor Memory public?

No. Production Vendor Memory is private and non-exportable. Public surfaces expose aggregate statistics and anonymised reported outcomes instead.

Is the evidence public?

Yes. AOPX exposes a public evidence ledger and public aggregate endpoints. Public evidence uses anonymised provider aliases and does not expose unique caller identity data.

What does 'Evidence over claims' mean?

It means AOPX prefers measurable results, frozen artifacts, provenance and stated limitations over unsupported marketing claims.

What did LAB-003.5 show?

LAB-003.5 evaluated 150 fresh SEARCH missions. In CRITICAL mode the AOPX policy reached 40/50 final successes, Tavily fixed reached 37/50, and a post-hoc Brave-to-Tavily cascade also reached 40/50.

Did LAB-003.5 prove contextual routing is better?

No. A post-hoc Brave-to-Tavily cascade reached the same 80% final success rate as the AOPX CRITICAL policy. The experiment supports fallback reliability more strongly than contextual-routing superiority.

What is LAB-004A?

LAB-004A is a development experiment for query-aware routing. Because the dataset had already been inspected, it is not treated as pristine prospective evidence and it did not trigger a production policy change.

What is a holdout?

A holdout is an evaluation set kept separate from policy development. Its evidentiary value is strongest when the missions remain untouched until the policy is frozen.

What is a frozen artifact?

A frozen artifact is a benchmark file that is not modified after publication and can be identified by its SHA-256 hash.

Why publish SHA-256 hashes?

Hashes make benchmark artifacts identifiable and auditable. They let a published result point to a specific frozen artifact set without exposing the private decision engine.

How agents and workflows connect to AOPX.

What is MCP?

Model Context Protocol is an open protocol that lets AI clients discover and call external tools. AOPX exposes a remote MCP server.

What is the AOPX MCP endpoint?

The public remote MCP endpoint is https://api.aopx.fr/mcp/ and the registry identifier is fr.aopx/aopx.

Which MCP tools does AOPX expose?

The public MCP surface exposes recommend_provider, report_outcome, public_stats and public_outcomes.

Is AOPX listed in the MCP Registry?

Yes. AOPX is listed under fr.aopx/aopx.

Is there an n8n integration?

Yes. The beta community package is n8n-nodes-aopx and exposes Recommend Provider, Report Outcome and Get Public Stats operations.

Does AOPX require authentication?

The current public MCP pilot is authless. This may change as the service moves beyond the pilot and adds stronger access control.

Does AOPX charge for the pilot?

No. Billing is disabled during the current public pilot.

Does AOPX process payments?

No. Payment processing is not part of the current pilot.

Data boundaries, providers and pilot status.

Does AOPX store search queries?

The current consultation flow does not require AOPX to execute the downstream search. Public evidence does not expose search payloads, caller identities, raw IP addresses or user-agent strings.

Does AOPX collect personal data?

AOPX does not require a public user profile for the pilot and does not maintain a customer-profile database for recommendation callers. The public website does use Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics 4 for standard audience measurement.

Are users or agents identifiable in public evidence?

No. Public telemetry is designed to avoid exposing agent names, session identifiers, raw IP addresses, unique origin hashes or user-agent strings.

Why are providers sometimes called Provider A and Provider B?

Public evidence can use neutral aliases so the evidence stream can be inspected without exposing the provider mapping on each public production record.

Is AOPX responsible for third-party provider content?

No. External providers, registries, partners and publishers remain responsible for their own APIs, publications, pricing, availability, policies and content.

Can AOPX support more categories later?

Yes, but AOPX does not present a category as supported until the product surface, evidence and production behavior are actually ready.

Can AOPX add more search providers?

Yes. Additional providers can be evaluated, but they should not be presented as production providers until they are integrated, tested and explicitly enabled.

Is Serper live in production?

No. Serper is currently treated as a provider under evaluation, not as an active production provider.

What is the long-term direction of AOPX?

The broader direction is machine-native provider selection for software agents: discovery, provider choice, execution, outcome reporting and an accumulating evidence history. The current live scope remains SEARCH.

Public evidence

Reported production outcomes and aggregate pilot statistics are public. Open the public evidence ledger →